[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 3
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Python 3 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:03:37 +0200 (CEST) |
> This does assume however that GUB is updated to at least target at
> least Python 2.6 (for __future__.print_function).
GUB already contains python 2.6 support. However, lilypond isn't set
up to use it. This should be rather simple to do, I think. However,
I haven't gub used since months and right now I lack time to re-learn
it...
Werner
- Re: Python 3, (continued)
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/26
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/27
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Joram, 2019/09/30
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
Re: 2.20 where are we?, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21