[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@
From: |
torsten . haemmerle |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:02:27 -0800 |
On 2020/02/25 13:33:13, lemzwerg wrote:
> If you really wanted 'i.e.' without a trailing comma, it would be
necessary to
> write 'i.e.@:'. Otherwise makeinfo inserts two spaces in the '.info'
file
> because we don't use '@frenchspacing' in the English docs.
Thanks for the valuable explanation. That's usual business for me in
TeX,
but I'll have to admit that I'm not so much into texinfo.
Anyway: I'll use the American version (with comma).
> 'being' would be correct if you continued the previous sentence.
However, you
> are starting a new one, so you have to use a verb (in a normal form).
Aaaargh, yes, of course. That's what's happening when altering a text
back
and forth, and you're perfectly right, of course. I must have been
blind.
> I was probably unclear. What I want is an example that shows how the
> 'french-correction' *property* changes the input. This is (a) to
execute the
> code path, and (b) a visualization of the property change.
Ah, now I see your point.
I'll add a new regression test comparing standard and French beaming.
In the existing "stand-alone" French beaming tests, the up-to-now wrong
stem lengths had always been there, but nobody noticed due to lack of
comparison.
I'll upload a new patch set as soon as the Naming of the Shrew has
finally
been decided upon (french-correction -> stem-end-shorten?,
French-shorten?)
Cheers,
Torsten
https://codereview.appspot.com/557500043/
- Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2020/02/23
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/24
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/24
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2020/02/25
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2020/02/25
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/25
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden),
torsten . haemmerle <=
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/02/25
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/02/25
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/25
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2020/02/26
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/02/26
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/02/26
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2020/02/26
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/26
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/02/26
- Re: Issue 5788: New French Beamimg Approach (issue 557500043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2020/02/26