|
From: | Lukas-Fabian Moser |
Subject: | Re: Manipulating instrument names and staff group names |
Date: | Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:14:39 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
Hi Kieren,
A blatant counter-example is in the person of Harm.So C++ and Scheme *are* [as I first suggested] separable?
There's lots of stuff one can do in Scheme alone. But it seems to me to be a non-trivial task in general to decide a priori whether, given a feature request or bug report, there is a feasible Scheme-only solution for that particular question.
Also, certain C++ parts of LilyPond can in principle be ported to Scheme, so even if some feature that you want to extend is currently implemented in C++, it might still be possible to re-implement it in Scheme.
Lukas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |