[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:02:30 +0000 (UTC) |
> I believe that these pdf documents are a significant improvement. I
> love them.
Good to hear, thanks.
> I do not see the need to use the syntax highlighting in the text
> references. In fact, I think the syntax highlighting in the text
> references would get in the way.
Could you explain why? I think it makes some sense if, for example,
`\foo` is always printed in bold.
Werner
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, (continued)
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/21
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Luca Fascione, 2022/02/21
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/21
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Luca Fascione, 2022/02/21
- "Structure and interpretation" of Scheme (was: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output), Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/21
- Re: "Structure and interpretation" of Scheme (was: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output), Luca Fascione, 2022/02/22
- Re: "Structure and interpretation" of Scheme (was: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output), Jean Abou Samra, 2022/02/22
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/02/22
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Luca Fascione, 2022/02/22
Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output, Carl Sorensen, 2022/02/23
- Re: Comments wanted on code highlighting in PDF output,
Werner LEMBERG <=