Re: Should we be touching goops?

[Dan Eble]

On Jun 5, 2022, at 08:36, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> While I agree with Dan that at the current point of time Moment is
> definitely overloaded too much (this has historical reasons since it had
> been the _only_ Scheme-accessible version of the Rational type, with
> Rational being required before Guile gained its own implementation of
> rational numbers), we disagree about where to draw the lines and how
> many of them.

I don't like to tell people who enjoy coding in Scheme how it should be done.  
If you want to use a single type for points in the musical timeline and for 
distances between points, that is fine.  Calling that type "moment" is 
problematic.
— 
Dan