|
From: | Aaron Hill |
Subject: | Re: Explicit default duration? |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:04:32 -0800 |
On 2023-01-23 4:01 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
Aaron Hill <lilypond@hillvisions.com> writes:Out of curiosity, would this work in your proposed syntax? "tamb4 r0 0 8 8" for "tamb4 r4 r4 tamb8 tamb8"No, it would be tamb4 r4 tamb4 tamb8 tamb8 . Rests have never had anyform of implicit notation. Saving a single letter is just not worth it.
Sorry, I typed too quickly. I meant tamb4 not r4. So it would work like any other bare duration.
-- Aaron Hill
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |