[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date in footer?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: date in footer? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:10:56 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:31:22AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> And we really (IMO) need to be doing it as part of moving to a 2.12 LSR.
> We should also be evaluating:
>
> A) Does it run in 2.12?
> B) Is it needed in 2.12 (i.e. has 2.12 introduced new features such that
> the snippet become irrelevant)?
There aren't so many new features in 2.12. And only the
doc-related snippets need to be evaluated.
> > I'm estimating 20 hours to organize the current lot, plus 1 hour
> > per month.
>
> With checking for vriable names, 2.12 validity, etc. I estimate about 15
> minutes per snippet (although the time may go down as skill goes up).
15 minutes is way too high. 90% of them can be done in 2 minutes.
And the snippets that can't be fixed in that time will have great
educational value, so if we can find non-experts to do this, it'll
be much better.
> With 448 files in the LSR
Including stuff from input/new/, we only have 288 snippets worth
examining. cd input/lsr; ls | wc;
> I think we need more than one person.
I really don't think so, mostly because that means that we need to
hand out more LSR editorships.
Also, my original 20-hour estimate[1] was for good tag
organization. Sure, there's many more tasks that can be done for
LSR. If there's more interest (i.e. volunteers), we can always
tackle more.
[1] you may notice that 2*288/60 gives 9 hours, which is in line
with my "think of how long it would take me, then double it" rule
for estimation.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: date in footer?, (continued)
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Chip, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/24
- Re: date in footer?, Chip, 2009/04/24
- Re: date in footer?, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/04/24
- Re: date in footer?, Brett Duncan, 2009/04/25