[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: short Musikmesse minutes
From: |
SoundsFromSound |
Subject: |
Re: short Musikmesse minutes |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:56:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Urs Liska wrote
> Am 20.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
>> Hi Urs,
>>
>>>> Time for a Lilypond Publishing House...
>>> I'd say rather push LilyPond into the existing publishing houses.
>>
>> Why not both?
>
> Nothing against it. But actually there _are_ already a number of
> "LilyPond Publishing Houses" - all of them of neglectable market impact.
>
>>
>>> And I think changes have never been better for that than now.
>>
>> True.
>>
>> In my opinion, here — in order of importance — are the things we need to
>> make established houses sit up and take notice:
>>
>> 1. Flawless MusicXML import and export.
>> 2. Better “pixel-level” control of objects.
>> 3. A finely-tuned stylesheet system.
>> 4. Excellent, “turnkey" edition control features.
>> 5. Several examples of fairly complex engravings, presented with “best
>> practice” coding.
>>
>> #4 is nearly in place, thanks to Jan-Peter.
>
> Indeed. I hope it will be possible to make that generally usable (be it
> through inclusion in LilyPond itself or a easily usable place in one of
> the libraries.
> Having this would be a valuable additional selling point.
>
>>
>> #3 would take, in my estimation, about 10 person-hours to prepare an
>> exemplar set of stylesheets (I’d be happy to do this myself), and 5-10
>> hours to create an appropriate stylesheet-loading function.
>>
>
> I'm not so sure if this would really matter that much in terms of
> "market penetration".
> Which isn't to say that I'd find that highly desirable myself.
>
>> #5 could be put together in “no time”.
>
> At the messe I had a compilation of samples (explicitly including
> non-publication quality "default" engravings) with me (including your
> Beethoven BTW), and this proved very useful.
>
>>
>> #2 would require some fundamental changes to Lilypond — likely this is
>> the largest hurdle.
>
> Apart from pixel-level it will be a tremenduous step if we manage to get
> a certain kind of graphical approach to that, as is currently being
> worked on in Frescobaldi.
> Graphically editing things while retaining strict control over the
> source code will be a killer feature.
> So I'd add that as a separate item to your list.
>
>>
>> #1 is the next largest hurdle.
>
> Yes, and a crucial one. But I think current development is very
> promising. For the first time someone is actually working on it.
> Although it is only a first step this is really a solid foundation.
> (Although only visible when using Frescobaldi from its Git repository.
>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> One thing that isn't in your list - and which already is there - is
> everything around the power of version controlled workflows. This
> provides solutions to actual problems people have. At least this was my
> experience in Frankfurt. Everybody seems to know about the hassles one
> has with concurrent revisions of files when having to pass documents
> around. Meticulous project documentation, encapsulation in branches etc.
> were keywords editors could grasp immediately.
> Question is how they will react when they see actual LilyPond code. I'm
> looking forward to that (there are two publishers I'll visit for closer
> demonstrations, with two more I have hopes to get to that point too).
>
> Urs
>
>>
>> Kieren.
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>
> lilypond-user@
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Are there any style sheets floating around that people can take a look at?
The sheet Urs & co. used looked great to my eyes, on that collection.
Maybe that could help users and also inspire them to create their own sorts
of "house styles". Just a thought...
-----
composer | sound designer
LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/short-Musikmesse-minutes-tp160594p160628.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- short Musikmesse minutes, Klaus Föhl, 2014/03/19
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Francois Planiol, 2014/03/19
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Urs Liska, 2014/03/19
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/03/19
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Urs Liska, 2014/03/19
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes,
SoundsFromSound <=
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Francois Planiol, 2014/03/19
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, David Kastrup, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Urs Liska, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Francois Planiol, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Anthonys Lists, 2014/03/22
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Urs Liska, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Johan Vromans, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, Urs Liska, 2014/03/20
- Re: short Musikmesse minutes, pls, 2014/03/20