[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?
From: |
Valentin Petzel |
Subject: |
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:24:04 +0200 |
Hello Harm,
This is probably quite hard to do. Basically the problem here is that Lilypond
does not in fact know the actual extent of the stencil. So to get that you’d
somehow need to draw the stencil. So eighter you’d need to implement a custom
drawing routine for "drawing" stencils within Lilypond, or you could try to do
a function that takes a stencil, creates a new book containing that stencil,
you’d then postprocess that file with a script that determines the actual
extent and writes it into an auxiliary file, which is then included and gives
the first function a value for overriding the extent.
Cheers,
Valentin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Thomas Morley, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?,
Valentin Petzel <=
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21