[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?
From: |
Valentin Petzel |
Subject: |
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:59:07 +0200 |
Hello David,
That is a very different thing. with-outline simply tells the outputter to use
a different stencil for calculating the skylines of a stencil. The problem
here is that Lilypond relies on the stencil basically telling it’s extent. The
problem Harm has is that this extent might be smaller than the actual size of
the printed symbol.
So Harm is looking for a way to determine the acutal printed size of a symbol.
And no, Lilypond does not draw this stuff internally. I mean, Lilypond relies
on Ghostscript to draw it’s output. If Lilypond wanted to do this, it would
need it’s own PostScript interpreter.
Cheers,
Valentin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Thomas Morley, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?,
Valentin Petzel <=
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21