[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:53:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Valentin Petzel <valentin@petzel.at> writes:
> Ah, I’m sorry, I might have misinterpretet what with-outline does. I thought
> it just creates a stencil that prints a markup, but specifies the skylines of
> a different markup.
Sure. But the skylines don't fall from the sky. At least not in a
manner that would not be repeatable in other code.
> So basically we would need a cc hook that creates a new
> Lazy_skyline_pair and calls interpret_stencil_for_skyline on that and
> the stencil? Upon which we would need to parse that path to get the
> actual dimensions of the stencil?
We don't need the actual dimensions I think, just the min/max of
horizontal and vertical skylines, respectively.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, (continued)
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/20
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, David Kastrup, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: markup-command boxing the real printed ink?, Valentin Petzel, 2021/04/21