[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terminology question
|
From: |
Hans Åberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Terminology question |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:31:27 +0200 |
It is Merriam–Webster—there are many Webster. And no.
> On 15 Jun 2021, at 20:24, Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonmark@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Hans,
>
> For Webster is a haircut only just a hair cut?
>
> M
>
> From: lilypond-user
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr.com@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Hans
> Åberg
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:08 AM
> To: Jacques Menu <imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch>
> Cc: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: Terminology question
>
>
>> On 15 Jun 2021, at 16:20, Jacques Menu <imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>>
>> What would be the plural of ‘figured bass’,…
>
> It is figured basses, or continuos (singular continuo), according to
> Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
- Re: Terminology question, Robert Gaebler, 2021/06/17
- Re: Terminology question, Jacques Menu, 2021/06/18
- Re: Terminology question, Kevin Barry, 2021/06/18
- RE: Terminology question, Robert Gaebler, 2021/06/18
- Re: Terminology question, Jacques Menu, 2021/06/18
- Re: Terminology question, David Zelinsky, 2021/06/19
- RE: Terminology question, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2021/06/19
- Re: Terminology question, David Wright, 2021/06/19
- RE: Terminology question, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2021/06/19