[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terminology question
From: |
Jacques Menu |
Subject: |
Re: Terminology question |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:40:25 +0200 |
Thanks everybody for your help!
I asked the question because MusicXML describes an element of the figured bass
this way:
<figured-bass>
<figure><figure-number>3</figure-number></figure>
<duration>8</duration>
</figured-bass>
I’ll use ‘figured bass element’ and 'figured bass elements’, they suit my
purpose nicely.
A nice day!
JM
> Le 15 juin 2021 à 20:31, Hans Åberg <haberg-1@telia.com> a écrit :
>
> It is Merriam–Webster—there are many Webster. And no.
>
>
>> On 15 Jun 2021, at 20:24, Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonmark@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hans,
>>
>> For Webster is a haircut only just a hair cut?
>>
>> M
>>
>> From: lilypond-user
>> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr.com@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
>> Hans Åberg
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:08 AM
>> To: Jacques Menu <imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch>
>> Cc: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
>> Subject: Re: Terminology question
>>
>>
>>> On 15 Jun 2021, at 16:20, Jacques Menu <imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>> What would be the plural of ‘figured bass’,…
>>
>> It is figured basses, or continuos (singular continuo), according to
>> Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
>
- Re: Terminology question, Robert Gaebler, 2021/06/17
- Re: Terminology question, Jacques Menu, 2021/06/18
- Re: Terminology question, Kevin Barry, 2021/06/18
- RE: Terminology question, Robert Gaebler, 2021/06/18
- Re: Terminology question, Jacques Menu, 2021/06/18
- Re: Terminology question, David Zelinsky, 2021/06/19
- RE: Terminology question, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2021/06/19
- Re: Terminology question, David Wright, 2021/06/19
- RE: Terminology question, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2021/06/19
- Re: Terminology question, Aaron Hill, 2021/06/19