lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Terminology question


From: David Wright
Subject: Re: Terminology question
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:23:21 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Sat 19 Jun 2021 at 18:05:15 (-0700), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> 
> I'll accept the burden.
> His plays with dynamic dynamics.

Apart from the typo (it's not a sentence), I suppose it might
be interesting to know what you would mean by uttering it.

> From: David Wright [mailto:lilylis@lionunicorn.co.uk] 
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 5:38 PM
> 
> On Sat 19 Jun 2021 at 10:53:40 (-0700), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> 
> > Yes, yet what if the level was dynamic, i.e., changing, then dynamic would 
> > operate as an adjective - stating what kind?
> 
> When I listen to the TV, the dynamic level varies between programmes and 
> adverts. I think the burden is on you to construct a sentence that describes 
> this, and which uses dynamic as an adjective. (Of course, any example will 
> do.)
> 
> > From: lilypond-user 
> > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr.com@gnu.org] On Behalf 
> > Of David Zelinsky
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 10:12 AM
> > 
> > Just a pendantic remark that, in the phrase "dynamic level", the word 
> > "dynamic" is still being used as a noun, though it is modifying another 
> > noun.  Technically it is a "noun adjunct".  It would also make sense to 
> > interperet it as the *adjective* "dynamic", but then "dynamic level"
> > would mean a level that is dynamic, i.e. changing.  That makes sense, but 
> > it's not what was meant in the present context.
> > 
> > -David
> > 
> > Robert Gaebler <Bob.Gaebler@outlook.com> writes:
> > >
> > > Thanks… happy to advise.  I would call \ff a dynamic.
> > > “Dynamics” is an interesting word, described as “plural in form, 
> > > singular or plural in construction” in Merriam-Webster. The plural 
> > > construct usually refers to the entire range of variation of loud to 
> > > soft within a piece.  So you might say, “The dynamics in this etude 
> > > are exquisite!”  (Plural in construction.) But a conductor or music 
> > > teacher might caution, “Now, watch the dynamics here!” (Singular in 
> > > construction, admonishing caution in the _application_ of dynamic 
> > > expression in this particularly difficult
> > > passage.)
> > > The \ff is a specific mark denoting a dynamic level to be applied at 
> > > the point of usage.  Note that “dynamic” is both an adjective and a 
> > > noun.  The mark in the score is referred to as a dynamic (noun).  It 
> > > denotes a dynamic (adjective) level to be expressed.
> > > I hope this helps.
> > >
> > > BoG
> > >
> > > From: Jacques Menu<mailto:imj-muzhic@bluewin.ch>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 1:00 AM
> > >
> > > BTW, another question came to me: in the LP notation manual, ‘dynamic’ is 
> > > sometimes a noun as in ‘dynamics’ and sometimes an adjective as in 
> > > ’dynamic mark’.
> > > So, is \ff a dynamic or a dynamics?
> > >
> > > JM

Cheers,
David.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]