[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Persian music package
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: Persian music package |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Aug 2021 20:47:42 +0200 |
> On 6 Aug 2021, at 18:46, Kees van den Doel <kvdoel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well I know Persian music very well, and the tuning as-is is perfect, so I'm
> not sure what we are talking about here.
> Persian music doesn't "raise by commas". There are no "different tunings",
> there is the current MIDI tuning which is correct and anything different is
> wrong.
The values you have set are wrong from the theoretical point of view:
Persian music uses the Pythagorean tuning of which E53 is a close
approximation. The average values that Hormoz Farhat's Dastgah book indicates
is a neutral second raised about two commas from the minor second, which is
what one typically uses.
E53 has a sharp that is 5 commas, but a minor second m = 4 and a major second M
= 5, which is what Graham Breed's file regular.ly does.
You have merely divided the LilyPond sharp into 5 parts, then using the
theoretical comma values indicated above, without adjusting the minor and major
seconds, so you land on E60.
- Fwd: Persian music package, (continued)
- Message not available
- Fwd: Persian music package, Kees van den Doel, 2021/08/02
- Re: Persian music package, Thomas Morley, 2021/08/03
- Re: Persian music package, Kees van den Doel, 2021/08/03
- Re: Persian music package, Thomas Morley, 2021/08/03
- Re: Persian music package, Thomas Morley, 2021/08/03
- Re: Persian music package, Adam Good, 2021/08/03
Re: Persian music package, Thomas Morley, 2021/08/01
Re: Persian music package, Kees van den Doel, 2021/08/06
Message not availableRe: Persian music package, Hans Åberg, 2021/08/06