Re: \include inside function

[David Kastrup]

Valentin Petzel <valentin@petzel.at> writes:

>> And it still breaks down because at the top level, LilyPond input does
>> not reflect a static structure but directs actions, actions that have
>> immediate consequences _while_ still reading ahead.
>
> I do not understand why this matters here? Doesn’t this only matter
> while we are parsing the file?

You won't get far without parsing the file.

> I understand that delayed scheme calls to variables defined in the
> subfile poses some challenge, but such things should be rather
> uncommon.

Feel free to create an implementation.  That will apparently be easier
than to prove viability to me.

-- 
David Kastrup