lout-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The PDF back end


From: bln
Subject: Re: The PDF back end
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:01:40 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi Kyle,

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:39:17AM -0600, Kyle wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
>
> > As Jeff said, the problem is that Lout depends too much on the
> > PostScript programming language.  Perhaps now is the time to
> > start transitioning to a new model, where there is no direct
> > connection between the Lout system and the final output format.
> > This should be done in small, testable steps so that the
> > transition can happen gradually and without breaking anything.
>
> Why transition away from the most powerful and most widely accepted graphical
> scripting language in the world?

Postscript has been tied directly into Lout and its macro packages. This
umbilical cord allowed Lout to grow into its current form. But if Lout wants
to continue to grow, this umbilical cord has to be severed at some point in
time.

> Why reinvent the wheel?

Lout would still support Postscript, of course, but an additional layer
would be present between Lout's core and the back ends. Changing the core
would no longer mean changing all of the back ends as well. Adding a new
back end would no longer require changing the macro packages and the
documents itself. Is that so bad?


- --
Regards,                                                        /\
=Martin=                                                        \/
                       ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML Mail  /\

PGP:  FE87448B  DDF8 677C 9244 D119 4FE0  AE3A 37CF 3458 FE87 448B


From: address@hidden
To: Kyle <address@hidden>, Lout List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: The PDF back end
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>; from address@hidden on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 
08:39:17AM -0600
X-S-Issue: address@hidden 2001/05/19 15:57:19 f16e56ab02d0825c7341752b4ca96056
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjsGe8YACgkQN880WP6HRIuHVQCdHtSNpCOi0xJeh4VSzUWL2iMs
sREAnA4fLnXniFPO1Gb58/IUs0ek+FD3
=3s1c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]