ltib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltib] skell files overwritten by which pkg?


From: Stuart Hughes
Subject: Re: [Ltib] skell files overwritten by which pkg?
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:42:37 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)

Hi Michael,

I see the issue and I think I ran into this before and decided there's no right answer here, just choices. Although merge could be triggered by and package build, this could get annoying in the general case. The ideal behaviour would be if could only re-installed merge if one of the files in that package had been re-installed (so you could re-stomp). Unfortunately that wouldn't be simple to do.

So I think you're right that in the case of merge, you just need to say "if you think you might need merge re-installed, re-run ./ltib -p merge -f).

BTW: this is yet another reason why in my opinion merge is a less than idea package. As a general principle BSP packagers should avoid it.

Regards, Stuart

Michael Jones wrote:
Hi Stuart,

Stuart Hughes wrote:
Hi Michael,

There are files that deliberately get overwritten by normal package building as you progress. Skell is just a "good set of defaults" in many cases. So this behaviour is normal. To explain this behaviour, think busybox, this provides many utilities, but if you select the full utility (say bash), this will deliberately overwrite the busybox shell. The same kind of thing applies for skell (and other packages).

Now for this to work properly there are forward and reverse triggers in LTIB. So if you had bash selected and then de-selected it, LTIB would know to re-install busybox. However, this only works if you run ./ltib, not ./ltib -p _pkg_. The -p pkg stuff say "just work on that package". So in the case of skell you'd be better to do (as a workflow):

./ltib -p skell -m prep
edit,edit,edit
./ltib

This would cause skell to "build" and the right triggers to apply so that overwriting packages get re-installed.

This work flow isn't working for me. /etc/profile ended up being the one from skell and not the one from merge. After I "edit,edit,edit" in rpm/BUILD/skell-1.16/ and do ./ltib, the merge package doesn't get reinstalled. It looks like the skell-to-merge trigger is missing.

Here is some abbreviated output from my ./ltib build:
$ ./ltib
[...]
Processing: skell-mx
======================
Build path taken because: directory build, no prebuilt rpm,
scbuild/scdeploy already unpacked package
[...]

Processing: skell-mx
======================
Build path taken because: directory build, build key set, no prebuilt rpm,
rpmbuild [...] -bc [...]

Processing: skell-mx
======================
Build path taken because: directory build, build key set, no prebuilt rpm,
rpmbuild [...] -bi [...]

Processing: skell-mx
======================
Build path taken because: directory build, build key set, no prebuilt rpm,
rpmbuild [...] -bb [...]
[...]
sysconfig-mx rebuild forced by skell-mx
sysconfig-mx install forced by skell-mx

Processing: sysconfig-mx
==========================
Build path taken because: build key set,
[...]

Processing: merge
===================

Processing: modeps
====================

Note that sysconfig-mx gets triggered for an install and gets reinstalled but merge doesn't. Looking in ltib, I see that in $install_deps, PKG_SKELL triggers PKG_SYSCONFIG but not PKG_MERGE. This makes sense- just adding PKG_MERGE here isn't right because in the general case PKG_MERGE could overwrite really any package's files. I suppose for my work flow for now, doing "./ltib -p merge -f" after "./ltib" would work. This problem only jumped out at me originally because it changed my prompt, which made me suspicious that I was doing something wrong which resulted in other packages also not being installed correctly, which doesn't seem to be the case.

Would it make sense to make PKG_MERGE depend on everything? Or should we just say, "Hey, if you want to use merge to stomp on top of already installed stuff, that's sloppy and you're responsible for re-installing it when necessary"?

-Michael
So far as your rpm query goes, it does seem possible that /etc/profile is overwritten by the merge package. In the Savannah CVS I see this:

$ find config/platform/ -name profile
config/platform/ea3250/merge/etc/profile
config/platform/imx27ads/merge/etc/profile
config/platform/imx31ads/merge/etc/profile

NOTE: the merge directories are a way of simply stomping on top of files in the rootfs. Some BSP packagers use them, personally I believe it's best to avoid them if you can.

Regards, Stuart

Michael Jones wrote:
Hi Stuart,

In my tinkering with the network configure script, I've stumbled onto a different problem. I wanted to modify the /etc/rc.d/init.d/network script, which belongs to the skell package. But I noticed that if I do:
./ltib -p skell -m prep
<would theoretically make changes here>
./ltib -p skell -m scdeploy

... then some files change, even if I made no chanes to skell. The most noticeable was /etc/profile, because this changed the cmd line prompt. For example, after a normal LTIB build,

ltib$ cat rootfs/etc/profile
export PS1='mx31# '
export PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
alias ll='ls -l'

but after I re-install skell:

ltib$ cat rootfs/etc/profile
PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin
export PATH

So obviously this file is normally overwritten or modified by another package, and by re-installing skell I'm re-overwriting this. I guess the relevant question is: what is the right work flow for working on the skell package? I'd also like to know how to find out what other package overwrites this particular file? I tried:

ltib$ /opt/ltib/usr/bin/rpm --root /home/michael/iMX/eaglevision/ltib/ltib/rootfs --dbpath /var/lib/rpm/ -qf /etc/profile
merge-0.1-1
skell-1.16-2

but this looks like misinformation to me, since "merge" doesn't touch /etc/profile.

thanks,
Michael


MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstrasse 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 271090
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Gerhard Thullner, Werner Armingeon, Uwe Furtner, Hans-Joachim Reich





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]