[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited...
From: |
Daniel Carosone |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited... |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:35:48 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:47:36AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Incorrect. disapprove does what you describe it should do, as
> follows, except for the merge that you have to do separately:
Oh. Er. Um. Well... oops!
I blame a flaky memory, and perhaps the fact that the only time I
actually used this so far, it was probably to 'disapprove' something
that was at least a local head already. Sorry about that.
Regardless of what happens to 'disapprove', which at the very least is
poorly named, "revert -r" does sound useful in its own right. For
example, in a workspace merge, I could use it to pick files for the
merge result as they were in one or the other head being merged.
--
Dan.
pgpZqUlAt8oAW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/02/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Timothy Brownawell, 2006/02/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Daniel Carosone, 2006/02/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/02/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Bruce Stephens, 2006/02/10
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Nathaniel Smith, 2006/02/11
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Nathaniel Smith, 2006/02/11
[Monotone-devel] Re: Approval revisited..., Bruce Stephens, 2006/02/12