[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number t
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:39:32 -0500 |
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 19:23 -0400, address@hidden wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:50:34PM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> > > I am of the opinion that the next version of monotone should be 1.0
> > > because of
> > > the netsync flag day.
> >
> > -1
> >
> > A flag day certainly doesn't justify a version increment to 1.0, quite
> > the opposite, IMO.
> >
> > BTW: I'm a bit surprised by this flag day and don't remember any
> > discussion about whether it's worth it or not. Or when.
>
> Wasn't there a list of things that also needed a flag day -- with
> the intent that we do them all together and thus need only one flag day?
All I'm aware of is the NetsyncTodo page, which isn't terribly concrete
or complete, and generally has things that we either don't know how to
do or haven't started on.
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0, Zack Weinberg, 2009/08/24
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0, Markus Wanner, 2009/08/24
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0, Timothy Brownawell, 2009/08/24
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0, Timothy Brownawell, 2009/08/24
Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0, Stephen Leake, 2009/08/25