[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 09:13:37 -0700 |
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Stephen Leake
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Currently, 'status' checks to see if date_fmt (either from the option or
> from hook_get_date_format_spec) is valid, in the sense that
> date_t::as_formatted_localtime and date_t::from_formatted_localtime
> succeed when using it.
>
> On Win32, this check will always fail, because strptime is not
> implemented.
>
> So get_log_message_interactively should do the same check to decide
> whether to allow editing the commit date.
>
> That way, even on Unix, if the user provides a date_fmt that strptime
> doesn't like, commit won't fail.
We need to make it visually obvious in the editor when editing the
date won't have any effect, if we do this.
zw
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Thomas Moschny, 2010/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Derek Scherger, 2010/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/22
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/22
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/22
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/22
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] strptime not in MinGW time.h, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/22