Re: [Monotone-devel] status of release 1.1

[Markus Wanner]

On 05/04/2014 12:06 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> So I guess the timestamp that it supposed to handle
> ("1901-12-13T20:45:51") should not be acceptable with a 32 bit time_t
> and it should fail in such a case.

Exactly.

While time_t itself is 64-bits, some mktime internals are not. Maybe
Apple just doesn't care about dates prior 1902. Maybe I should have done
the same rather than the extensive check. It's not like people use
monotone to handle such dates...

Regards

Markus Wanner

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature