[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: GNU Evaluation: Edventure
From: |
Hugo Gayosso |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: GNU Evaluation: Edventure |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Apr 2002 21:13:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, I mistyped Savannah Hackers email address.
Also, note, that the author CAN be contacted, I have corrected it in
the original evaluation outline.
Hugo Gayosso <address@hidden> writes:
> Please confirm that we can close this evaluation.
>
> GNU Software Evaluation - Outline for Evaluations
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> * General Information
>
> ** Package name and version
>
> Edventure 3.6.9
>
> ** Author <Email>
>
> Douglas S. Blank <address@hidden>
>
> ** Should the authors(s) be contacted? (Y/N)
>
> Yes
>
> ** Requested by
>
> savannah-hackers@@gnu.org
>
> ** Message-ID
>
> 200201170443.g0H4hRGH017417@@ada.brynmawr.edu
>
> ** Evaluator
>
> Misha Tavkhelidze <address@hidden>
>
> ** Home page
>
> http://dangermouse.brynmawr.edu/edventure/
>
> ** Source
>
> http://dangermouse.brynmawr.edu/edventure/download/edventure-3.6.7.tgz
>
> ** Describe in your own words what job or jobs this program does.
>
> Edventure is a web based course management system written in PHP,
> designed to replace non-free proprietary programs such as WebCT or
> BlackBoard at a university or school. It provides course material
> online management capabilities, allows creation of exam questions
> and combining them into exam papers, tracking enrolled students
> marks, etc..
>
> * Package specifics
>
> ** Binaries available (Y/N)
>
> Not applicable
>
> ** GNU/Linux support? (Y/N)
>
> Yes
>
> ** License: (specify type - any problems?)
>
> GNU General Public License Version 2 or any later version.
>
> ** Dependencies: (ok/problematic + notes)
>
> PHP
>
> Hugo: Do you know if it can be used with PHP3 ?
>
> Mikheil: Unfortunately, not straight away. It uses some built_in
> functions and features that are present only in php4
> (i.e. "include_once" or default values for function
> arguments). Although, I think it can be easily rewritten
> to be usable under php3.
>
> Apache, Postgres or MySQL (any other RDBMS), GD (a graphic library
> for fast image creation) which is not GPL.
>
> GD copyright and licence statement from gd-1.8.3 readme.txt
> follows:
>
> Portions copyright 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000
> by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Funded under Grant
> P41-RR02188 by the National Institutes of Health.
>
> Portions copyright 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 by
> Boutell.Com, Inc.
>
> Portions relating to GD2 format copyright 1999, 2000 Philip Warner.
>
> Portions relating to PNG copyright 1999, 2000 Greg Roelofs.
>
> Portions relating to libttf copyright 1999, 2000 John Ellson
> (address@hidden).
>
> Portions relating to JPEG copyright 2000, Doug Becker and
> copyright (C) 1994-1998, Thomas G. Lane. This software is
> based in part on the work of the Independent JPEG Group.
>
> Portions relating to WBMP copyright 2000 Maurice Szmurlo and
> Johan Van den Brande.
>
> _Permission has been granted to copy, distribute and modify gd
> in any context without fee, including a commercial
> application, provided that this notice is present in
> user-accessible supporting documentation._
>
> This does not affect your ownership of the derived work
> itself, and the intent is to assure proper credit for the
> authors of gd, not to interfere with your productive use of
> gd. If you have questions, ask. "Derived works" includes all
> programs that utilize the library. Credit must be given in
> user-accessible documentation.
>
> _This software is provided "AS IS."_ The copyright holders
> disclaim all warranties, either express or implied, including
> but not limited to implied warranties of merchantability and
> fitness for a particular purpose, with respect to this code
> and accompanying documentation.
>
> Although their code does not appear in gd 1.8.3, the authors
> wish to thank David Koblas, David Rowley, and Hutchison Avenue
> Software Corporation for their prior contributions.
>
> ** Configuration:
>
> GNU coding standards compliant? No
>
> Installation and configuration is meant to be just setting up a web
> server (if needed) and copying the contents of tarball to
> appropriate directory (http document root), but in practice it's
> not so easy and needs some tweaking.
>
> Although README says package can be used with other RDBMS, SQL
> schema is present only for Postgres and to make system work I had
> to manually add 'admin' user to appropriate table.
>
> All configuration parameters are meant to be stored in a single
> file (edventure.php) used by other scripts, but in some files
> (dbi.php or help/index.cgi) some parameters are hard-coded.
>
> ** Compilation:
>
> Not applicable
>
> ** Usability/interface: (ok/problematic + notes)
>
> Ok. Interface is web based and seems pretty good to me. I've tested
> it with Netscape, IE, Konqueror.
>
> ** What languages is the program written in.
>
> PHP, some scripts in Perl. Entry page states JavaScript requirement
> but I was able to use package with JS switched off.
>
> ** Code
>
> *** Clarity/maintenance: (ok/problematic + notes)
>
> Ok
>
> *** Does it meet GNU Coding Standards?
>
> Not applicable
>
> ** Performance: (ok/problematic + notes)
>
> Not applicable. Non of the parts of a package are performance
> critical.
>
> ** documentation:
>
> *** Does the package include a good introduction or tutorial manual?
>
> No. It has built in help system, but it's unfinished.
>
> *** Does the package include a good reference manual?
>
> No. See above.
>
> ** Does the program recommend or encourage the use of any non-free software?
>
> No
>
> ** Does it have certain capabilities that can only be used in conjunction
> with some non-free software package?
>
> No
>
> * Evaluation summary
>
> ** Does the program fit coherently within the GNU system?
>
> It should be useful to have such a package which targets academic
> user base and allows to migrate from proprietary systems.
>
> ** Does the program meet necessary requirements for being a GNU package?
>
> Unfortunately I can't judge overall quality of Edventure as I'm not
> familiar with any other course management software packages.
>
> On other hand the package seems not to be quite ready for
> "production" use: some features are marked "under construction",
> some are implemented but aren't working, etc..
>
> ** Are there any licensing issues that need to be resolved?
>
> No, if GD licence (see above) is acceptable.
>
> ** Is there a large overlap with some other GNU package?
>
> None I'm aware of.
>
> ** Does the program have any gratuitous incompatibilities with other GNU
> packages?
>
> None I'm aware of.
>
> * Notes and comments during the evaluation process
>
> 17 Jan 2002 "Douglas S. Blank" address@hidden
>
> I wasn't aware of CAPA, but I took a look at it, and here is what I
> see as the main differences:
>
> CAPA looks fairly narrowly tailored to a specific teaching
> methodology and purpose. For example, it seems to focus on
> individual training question sets for students. In their own words:
> "... it enables faculty to augment their courses with individualized
> relevant exercises."
>
> On the other hand, Edventure is meant to be a general purpose,
> extendible, modular, framework with which to manage course materials
> and activities. This would include managing passwords for students,
> uploading assignments, maintaining a secure gradebook, providing a
> well thought out versioning system for questions and exams, etc.
>
> In other words CAPA could be turned into a plugin for Edventure,
> with Edventure providing the necessary infrastructure, API, and
> management tools, and CAPA providing exactly what it was designed
> for.
>
> CAPA is not meant to be a Black Board, or WebCT (two proprietary
> systems currently on the market). Edventure *is* meant to be a
> replacement for these types of systems.
>
> Black Board (blackboard.com) is the largest on-line course
> management system. Microsoft has just invested $20 million in Black
> Board. Black Board has vowed to make its system "work better" with
> Windows systems (as quoted in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Nov
> 23, 2001).
>
> Our schools are not the places to allow some systems to have
> advantage over others.
>
> Black Board (and WebCT) already make it very difficult for
> instructors to extract their course material out of their respective
> systems. Why would they make it easy to stop using their software?
>
> School administrators need a choice, and this could end up being a
> very important project. Microsoft has made it clear that they intend
> to battle for a place in education.
>
> There is another initiative: the Open Knowledge Initiative. However,
> they have been working for a year, but haven't make any details
> available to non-OKI members. Maybe the OKI will fill this niche. If
> so, I would be glad to jump on that band wagon.
>
> I suspect that Edventure could be fundable from outside sources, and
> I will follow up over the coming years.
>
> I think Edventure is an important concept, and I think it fits in
> with the GNU Project very well.
>
>
> --
> Hugo Gayosso
> GNU Software Evaluators
> Coordinator
>
> http://www.gnu.org
> http://www.gnu-friends.org/~hugo
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnueval mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnueval
>
>
- --
Hugo Gayosso
GNU Software Evaluators
Coordinator
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.gnu-friends.org/~hugo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8qRPDMNObVRBZveYRAvV+AJ44n0RNWGSnTDmIgyS3YB6LvDJ5MgCdGkOZ
Sp7/NUnA/bKeeG4DQ/8yLH4=
=Ids2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: GNU Evaluation: Edventure,
Hugo Gayosso <=