[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of UniPackage - savannah.nongnu.org
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of UniPackage - savannah.nongnu.org |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:38:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hi,
I have approved your project. You will receive an automated e-mail
containing detailed information about the approval.
Regards,
--
Sylvain
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:30:04AM +1000, Ben Myles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks again, I've added copyright and license notices to all files
> now. You can get the new archive at
> http://download.berlios.de/unipackage/UniPackage-0.5.2.tar.bz2 .
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:09:11 +0100, Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The file is still part of the files you will upload at Savannah and
> > needs appriopriate notices.
> >
> > If a GPL program includes _a part of itself_ in its output, then the
> > output is bound to the GPL, hence the stated exception in the license
> > notice.
> >
> > Since AppRun is very small you may want to use a simple all-permissive
> > license such as:
> >
> > Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
> > are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
> > notice and this notice are preserved.
> >
> > If AppRun is improved and gets more features, I suggest you then use
> > the Bison skeleton-like license. In that case, I think it is
> > acceptable to strip off comments at run time before to include AppRun
> > in the output.