|
From: | Vadim Konovalov |
Subject: | Re: [Texmacs-dev] Re: C++'s frustrations |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:37:15 +0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080526 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 |
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Henri Lesourd wrote:Probably under Linux it works most of the time,_always_and under windows it's more often broken:MSVC is really the defacto standard (KDE, python, LyX, etc all use it).
Very surprising informationNow TexMacs on Windows available only under Cygwin, and no MSVC is standard there.
I don't see the problem here. In any case, I think, but I am not sure, Borland and Intel compilers are compatible while Mingw's g++-3.2 is not (not sure about recent version of g++). So yes, I think that choosing either MSVC or Mingw would be a hard requirement for plugin developer. Or you can just see those two compilers as two different platforms and deliver a TeXMacs binary for both. That is exactly what the KDE on Windows people do by the way.
Given that GCC already used for texmacs, why is it a problem to continue using it on windows?
BR, Vadim.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |