[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite
From: |
David Morgan |
Subject: |
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:37:57 -0700 |
Hi Akim,
I've got the new version from CVS.
This gets further (no error message) except ...
I don't have automake, autoconf or autoheader found on the machine and (thus?)
it does not generate a makefile.
There is a message that no autoscan will be generated as perl is not found
but no message about no Makefile.
There may be some error going on but I can not see one.
I was going to install automake in case it is necessary. But automake's
configure requires perl which is also not on the machine.
At this rate I'm not likely to be able to keep going and testing further.
Can someone shed light on the situation and how I can continue on a machine
with limited support for things like perl if there is a dependency on automake.
Regards
David
Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> >>>>> "David" == David Morgan <address@hidden> writes:
>
> David> ac_file=tests/atconfig echo "X"$ac_file"" | sed '
> David> /^X\(.*^/\)\/\/*^/^/*\/*$/{ s//\1/p; q; }'
>
> Thanks a lot. That's an actual bug in Autoconf, but which is
> exhibited only on machines on which `expr' fails, which is probably
> your case.
>
> Here is what I'm currently checking in:
>
> 2000-10-18 Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
>
> * acgeneral.m4 (_AC_SHELL_DIRNAME): The `sed' fall back was not
> quoted.
>
> Index: acgeneral.m4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/acgeneral.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.579
> diff -u -r1.579 acgeneral.m4
> --- acgeneral.m4 2000/10/17 16:34:10 1.579
> +++ acgeneral.m4 2000/10/18 12:15:57
> @@ -926,12 +926,12 @@
> X$1 : 'X\(//\)$' \| \
> X$1 : 'X\(/\)' \| \
> . : '\(.\)' 2>/dev/null ||
> -echo "X$1" | sed '
> +echo "X$1" | sed ['
> /^X\(.*[^/]\)\/\/*[^/][^/]*\/*$/{ s//\1/p; q; }
> /^X\(\/\/\)[^/].*/{ s//\1/p; q; }
> /^X\(\/\/\)$/{ s//\1/p; q; }
> /^X\(\/\).*/{ s//\1/p; q; }
> - s/.*/./p; q'])
> + s/.*/./p; q']])
>
> ## --------------------------------------------------- ##
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, (continued)
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/26
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/26
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/26
- `' quotes in messages (was Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Raja R Harinath, 2000/10/26
- Re: `' quotes in messages (was Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Russ Allbery, 2000/10/26
- Re: `' quotes in messages, Paul Eggert, 2000/10/27
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/13
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/13
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/13
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/18
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite,
David Morgan <=
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/10/13
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/13
Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/19