[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-chat] Why 8051?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-chat] Why 8051? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:56:17 +0100 (MET) |
"King, Mike" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why would one choose an 8051 based microcontroller for new designs?
One argument that hasn't been posted so far: there's at least one
(possibly more) 8051 IP core around that can be freely used, including
integration into your own FPGAs or IC designs. That's one of the
reasons why, when equipping a custom IC with a microcontroller core,
an 8051 is often chosen. (Though I think that these folks probably
don't also have to program the controller afterwards... Given a
choice of two jobs where one involves programming an 8051-style
controller, and another one a modern controller core, I'd for sure not
touch the 8051 with a pole. There are also two non-Atmel AVR cores
around, for example, but sure, if your company is labelled something
else but "Atmel", you probably wouldn't want to claim ATmega103
compatibility in your datasheets. :)
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)