[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC code
From: |
C Y |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders... |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:30:35 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Bill Page <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I can see where we might be able to put together a NSIS based
> > installer of a merger of the latest build-improvements, the
> > Guess package and maybe Emacs as a GUI for Windows, if that
> > would help,
>
> Yes, that is very easy to accomplish.
OK. I am of the opinion that, given the already large size of Axiom,
it is worth bundling a binary of Emacs and making that the default UI
unless/until something better becomes available. Anyone else have an
opinion on that one?
> I would not anticipate any problems at all - especially if we
> can merge changes from wh-sandbox back into build-improvements.
OK.
> I hope Martin says "yes". Surely you can find a Windows box down
> at the K-mart for not much money. ;) And I as I have said several
> times before: I have done this before and I would be very glad
> to help someone do it again.
We are long overdue for a Windows release. I might be able to get
access to a box in about 3 weeks, and if I can I'll set up an Axiom
build environment and take a stab at it. I'm a Linux guy myself but we
really need something newer than the current binary...
Cheers,
CY
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, Bill Page, 2007/04/16
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, gdr, 2007/04/16
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, Bill Page, 2007/04/16
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, gdr, 2007/04/16
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, Bill Page, 2007/04/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, Waldek Hebisch, 2007/04/18
- RE: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, Bill Page, 2007/04/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] differences wh-sandbox andbuild-improvements, Camm Maguire, 2007/04/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., C Y, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Bill Page, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders...,
C Y <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Help needed, was: (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Martin Rubey, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Help needed, was: (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., C Y, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Help needed, Bill Page, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Help needed, was: (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Bill Page, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., C Y, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., Bill Page, 2007/04/10
- Re: [Axiom-developer] (Possible) reasons Axiom didn't appeal to SoC coders..., C Y, 2007/04/10