[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extension of file-test primitives?
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: extension of file-test primitives? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:11:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
On 8/21/17 9:27 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 05:30:34PM -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
>> Allowing:
>>
>> test -{f,x} /bin/ls && ...
>> or
>> if [[ -{f,x} $file ]]; then ... ; fi
>>
>> instead of:
>>
>> test -f /bin/ls && test -x /bin/ls && ...
>
> You could write your own helper functions for this:
>
> -fx() { test -f "$1" && test -x "$1"; }
This is indeed a quick and easy way to implement desired functionality.
Shell functions can do a lot.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Greg Wooledge, 2017/08/21
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, L A Walsh, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Greg Wooledge, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, L A Walsh, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Pierre Gaston, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Greg Wooledge, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Dethrophes, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Dethrophes, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23