[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Apologise and explanation (Was: Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs ...)
From: |
Stefan Urbanek |
Subject: |
Apologise and explanation (Was: Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs ...) |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:52:22 +0200 |
Hi,
At first, I apologise if my mails offended someone, it was not intentional.
Here few last explanations to end this lenthgy thread:
Concerning the bug, i have said that i have problems 1. with latin2 characters 2. with
cut&paste between X and GS in general and 3. with cut and paste of strings > 1024
characters. So there were three kinds of problems together. I was really frustrated by that
misbehaviour at the time of writing my emails, because at that time I wanted to do quite a lot
of quick cut & pastes between GS and X. It used to work. (Yes, know that I can still
cut&paste using Ink.app and save to a file, but then I still can use assembly for coding).
Yes, I play and pretend that I am end-user and I will allways do that when
working. All developers dealing with the code/functionality, that end users
will be directly in contact with, HAVE to pretend that THEY (developers) are
end-users! And in fact, the discussed issue is out of my scope of knowledge,
therefore I am end user of that functionality.
About hacks... any requirement to change source code using autoconf/configure
IS modification of source code) should be considered as inappropriate and
therefore it is not for end-users. Here I would like to thank Fred for hist
NSDefaults way of having an option.
Btw. I did not offended you in any manner in my emails and I found your saying (among
others in neighbour paragraphs): "So I was quite surprised when I found you
identified yourself as GNUstep developer somewhere. " really offensive to me. But
this does not belong to this list, please read my next email.
Have a nice day,
Stefan
<rest snipped>
--
http://urbanek.host.sk
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you
win.
- Mahatma Gandhi
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, (continued)
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Stefan Urbanek, 2003/08/08
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2003/08/08
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Stefan Urbanek, 2003/08/08
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2003/08/09
- Proposal for reverting gpbs changes (Was: Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs...), Stefan Urbanek, 2003/08/09
- Re: Proposal for reverting gpbs changes (Was: Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs...), Pete French, 2003/08/10
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Fred Kiefer, 2003/08/10
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Stefan Urbanek, 2003/08/10
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2003/08/11
- Apologise and explanation (Was: Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs ...),
Stefan Urbanek <=
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Adam Fedor, 2003/08/11
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Fred Kiefer, 2003/08/14
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Pete French, 2003/08/16
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Fred Kiefer, 2003/08/16
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Pete French, 2003/08/18
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Stefan Urbanek, 2003/08/18
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Fred Kiefer, 2003/08/18
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Pete French, 2003/08/19
- Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Fred Kiefer, 2003/08/29
Re: [bug #4658] Broken gpbs when doing pb operations between GS and X, Pete French, 2003/08/08