[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:43:24 +0200 |
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 15:39, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
> > IIRC, SBCL itself is built in 2 stages. First its core is compiled
> > using another Common Lisp implementation (currently clisp in Guix), then
> > the complete SBCL is compiled using the core compiled in stage 1. There
> > is probably also an embedded timestamp issue here (coming for clisp,
> > from SBCL, or both) causing the reproducibility issue.
In addition, GCC is also involved in the party. And I have also
replaced it by Clang with the same effect.
Cheers,
simon
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible,
zimoun <=
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/22
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/22
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21