[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:13:49 +0200 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> If upstream does not want to patch, do you think it is doable to patch
> SLIME and maintain the patch with the Guix package?
Accepted or not, we also need to ping the SLY maintainer to apply the
same change. (SLY is a fork of SLIME.)
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/22
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21