bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible

[Pierre Neidhardt]

Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes:

> A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but
> currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could
> be fixed [2]. We'll see...
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/
> [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583

Thank you so much for asking!

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature