[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
From: |
Guillaume Le Vaillant |
Subject: |
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:45:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
>> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify
>> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible...
>
>Thanks for the explanation.
A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but
currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could
be fixed [2]. We'll see...
[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/
[2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible,
Guillaume Le Vaillant <=
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/22
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/22
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21