[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!

From: Filip Brcic
Subject: Re: No to StowFS!
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 02:10:41 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.9

Дана Friday 03 February 2006 01:58, Alfred M. Szmidt је написао(ла):
>    I do agree that such a behavior could be considered broken, but if
>    most of the programs do that I believe that the support for them
>    should be provided.
> And this is easy to do, provide /usr as a symbolic link to / if such
> support is needed.

Yes, of course. I just meant to say that those programs (scripts) shouldn't 
necessarily be considered broken... even if they truly are.

Filip Brcic <brcha@users.sourceforge.net>
WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/
Jabber: brcha@kdetalk.net
Jabber: brcha@elitesecurity.org
Jabber: fbrcic@gmail.com
ICQ# 40994923
Yahoo! brcha
MSN: brcha@users.sourceforge.net

Attachment: pgpqJYgPiMWPb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]