[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!

From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: Re: No to StowFS!
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:18:21 +0100

   I admit I'm not sure of all the context here, but is there some
   proposal that /usr will not resolve in GNU?  That seems impractical
   to me.  Virtually everything ever written uses /usr, one way or

There aren't many things that need /usr, most things will figure out
such information during compile time.  In either case, keeping or not
keeping `/usr -> .' is really not an issue, there is no harm in
keeping it around for now, and when the time comes, it is easy to

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]