[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:21:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2018-06-25 04:04, David Kastrup wrote:
>> "James Lowe" <address@hidden> writes:
>>> If Aaron has specific examples (which doc, which page) then maybe I
>>> can at least confirm this on master if that is going to help or not?
>>
>> But yes: specific examples would be good.
>
> No problem. Notation Reference, Chapter 1: Musical notation, Section
> 1.1: Pitches:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf (Page 1)
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/pitches
>
> Of note, this seems to only affect the English versions. In the
> index...
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/
>
> ...I see that notation.pdf is 4.2M whereas notation.de.pdf, for
> instance, is 6.3M. Sounds like it could be an issue with font
> embedding.
>
> I opened up the changes.pdf (which is a smaller document) in
> LibreOffice Draw and can see that the document is referencing
> Emmentaler but it was not included.
Knut, the following patches from you are in master but not in stable.
Would we need to transfer more of them? Particularly the middle one
looks like a candidate but I don't really know whether we'll need
additional ones.
The problem with the newest one would be that you generated it
automatically from the newest version of Emmentaler but the patch itself
does not consult the actual Emmentaler version and the commit you list
as breaking encodingdefs.ps (by adding a Haydn turn to Emmentaler) is
not present in the stable branch. So I considered it best to leave that
one off. Any chance for doing this automatically at some point in
future?
commit 68d904661e8539c77d37eba212d97f8cff082c09
Author: Knut Petersen <address@hidden>
Date: Sun Jun 24 11:33:39 2018 +0100
Issue 5338 - Fix 'out of sync' ps script defs
Commit 12fe78825798191ecb7e5a4ee3064679773ae1ab
broke encodingdefs.ps.
The glyphs are now included in
the same order as they are in
the emmentaler fonts.
The order of the glyphs does not
matter as long as the encoding
vector and the corresponding
commands match.
The change occured because I'd
decided to use otfinfo and sed
to generate the new code -
it seemed easier, safer and faster
than correcting the old code by hand.
commit 398c2e17d45bf4d18723e14d52531e4e7d006dea
Author: Knut Petersen <address@hidden>
Date: Tue Oct 3 15:05:56 2017 +0100
Adapt lilypond to ghostscript 9.22, change command line options
Issue 5201
We need to adapt lilypond
to ghostscript 9.22 as our
old --bigpdf parameter is
broken by the new version
of gs.
--bigpdf is totally removed.
--pspdfopt=(size/TeX/TeX-GS)
is implemented to allow the
user to select the appropiate
set of -d... parameters for
different purposes.
The patch also contains some
minor fixes of related bugs,
introduces --eps to the
command line interface and
changes the bug-report
message, as post.gmane is
gone.
commit e8b2544334fa66858c09028719fa82c447037291
Author: Knut Petersen <address@hidden>
Date: Wed Jul 26 12:36:38 2017 +0200
Fix issue 5110: Don't use fixed color for LyricHyphens
Signed-off-by: Knut Petersen <address@hidden>
--
David Kastrup
- PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, James Lowe, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Phil Holmes, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/06/27
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Phil Holmes, 2018/06/27
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/27
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/27