Re: texi2dvi: A more pleasant way to compile

[Stepan Kasal]

Hello,

I apologize that I step in again.

On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 06:45:31PM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
>   we have to have the dual/complex implementation.  Sorry Akim.

But should the ``old behaviour'' stay exactly as it is?
Or should it do the work in a tmp subdir and copy the xref files forth
and back?
I think Akim should pick what's easier for him to implement.

>   I don't like --mostlyclean [...] DVI files should be removed
>   at `clean', not `mostlyclean'.

OK, dvi, ps and pdf would be removed at `clean'.
But should't `mostlyclean' remove the xref files?  (I mean all but dvi, ps
and pdf.)  So the *.t2d and *.t2p subdirs would be removed by `mostlyclean'.

Have a nice day,
        Stepan