Re: Making it possible to extend implicit INFOPATH

[Benno Schulenberg]

Karl Berry wrote:
> 2. I don't think renaming info-stnd to info makes sense, as we
> already discussed.

It's not renaming that is asked, but that 'info info' should show 
the info-stnd document instead of the info document, just like 
'info --usage info' already does.  Making only the latter show a 
different document is confusing.

> 3. Surely most new users reading the documentation want to learn
> how to read Info documents.

The very first line in the info-stnd document tells them to read the 
info document first if they don't know how to use 'info' yet.  Also 
the 'H' key will take them there.

Benno