[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.util.logging
From: |
Brian Gilstrap |
Subject: |
Re: java.util.logging |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:58:46 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 |
Sascha,
> I am extremely glad that you are interested in discussing the API
> and our respective implementations. Also, I totally agree with
> what you wrote about the advantages of working together. So, I am
> very much looking forward to doing this.
Great!
> An administrative question: Do people really want copies of our
discussion
> on the address@hidden mailing list? I am not sure it will be of
> interest to everyone involved with GNU Classpath. What about taking
> the discussion somewhere else, e.g. to your javalogging-
address@hidden
> list (which is archived as well)?
I agree that this is probably not of interest to the entire GNU
Classpath list (also, I'm not currently a member of the list and have
plenty of other list emails to wade through... :-).
Using a discussion list at SourceForge seems like a great idea. There is
a javalogging-developer mailing list that I had not previously made
public (because there wasn't anyone else to talk to :-). I've also
arranged for every posting to the developer forum on SourceForge to be
forwarded to address@hidden It is archived at:
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/12859/0/
Why don't we use address@hidden for our
discussion?
> Nope, we use the same naming style. One big difference is
> MemoryHandler (6589 bytes [including MemoryHandler.RingBuffer] vs.
> 1899 bytes). This is a place where my implementation is simpler
> (and it will be interesting to discuss the respective advantages
> and disadvantages).
Just this one comment is already getting me revved up for a great
discussion. It will be nice to discuss things with someone who has also
taken a serious look at the spec.
> PS: I won't be able to do much for the next week or so, so please
> don't think I've lost interest if you don't hear from me
> immediately. I'll be back.
I'm in the same boat. I won't be able to much of anything until about
March 10th or so. I'll look forward to hooking back up to get things
started when our schedules loosen up a bit.
Brian
--
Brian R. Gilstrap
address@hidden
Husband and father, Tai Chi practitioner, Software architect
Java developer, Macintosh User
"Doubtless, like all of us, he was many men, turned on one or another of
his selves as occasion required, and kept his real self a frightened
secret from the world." --Will Durant
- Re: java.util.logging, (continued)
- Re: java.util.logging, Brian Jones, 2002/02/27
- Re: java.util.logging, Sascha Brawer, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Brian Jones, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Sascha Brawer, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Brian Jones, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Brian Gilstrap, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Sascha Brawer, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Brian Gilstrap, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging, Sascha Brawer, 2002/02/28
- Re: java.util.logging,
Brian Gilstrap <=
- Re: java.util.logging, Tom Tromey, 2002/02/28