[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ? |
Date: |
04 Aug 2004 10:40:07 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Kennke <address@hidden> writes:
Roman> the autotools should check for OSs/arches and include the correct
Roman> subdirs here. These functions must be kept minimal, in order to avoid
Roman> the effect that Michael mentioned, where you have to fix a bug multiple
Roman> times.
I just wanted to interject a note about auto* here -- if you do use
it, it is generally better not to look at OS/arch and instead just
write feature tests. This gets the most benefit and there is a long
history showing this has less maintenance burden and better
portability.
I don't have an opinion on whether to keep TARGET_*, as libgcj has its
own native layer and is not likely to switch. Just FYI, libgcj's
approach is a hybrid -- for Unixy systems we use autoconf feature
tests, but we treat Windows as a separate "flavor" with its own
implementation of native things.
Tom
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, (continued)
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/08/08
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Andrew Haley, 2004/08/09
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Dalibor Topic, 2004/08/09
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Ingo Prötel, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Michael Koch, 2004/08/04
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?,
Tom Tromey <=
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Roman Kennke, 2004/08/03
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Steven Augart, 2004/08/06
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/08/06
- Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Andy Walter, 2004/08/06
- Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS (was: Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?), Steven Augart, 2004/08/06
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Casey Marshall, 2004/08/10
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Michael Koch, 2004/08/11
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Casey Marshall, 2004/08/11
- Re: Classpath License, Phillosophy, and AICAS, Michael Koch, 2004/08/11
Re: Removing the TARGET_* layer or not ?, Steven Augart, 2004/08/07