[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus
From: |
dog |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 08:57:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i (Darwin) |
dixit aselkirk:
> ANT is awesome! I have been learning a lot about ANT recently at work and
> I'm quite impressed with its simplicity and flexibility. ...
>
> I would like to add ANT to activation and javamail as well.
>
> Thoughts/comments?
i have been very impressed with ant as well. if we aren't allowed to
redistribute ant itself because of licensing issues, which seems fair
enough, i cannot see why we would not be able to provide ant build.xmls to
build jaf and javamail. i for one would be pro - i could just check in the
one i used to build javamail myself ;-)
--
dog
zx750-p5 sl-mille ukrmma#18
sol lucet omnibus ... praeter anglorum
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), (continued)
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), David Brownell, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), Olivier LF, 2001/12/06
- [Classpathx-discuss] autoconf/automake, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/06
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] autoconf/automake, Olivier LF, 2001/12/06
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] autoconf/automake, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/06
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), David Brownell, 2001/12/06
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus, David Brownell, 2001/12/02
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus,
dog <=
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus, Raif S. Naffah, 2001/12/03