[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???)
From: |
David Brownell |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???) |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Dec 2001 13:33:21 -0800 |
> > > Shared libraries (for gcj), automake does all the work with only
> > > 3 lines of input.
> >
> > I'd be interested in seeing ClasspathX adopt automake (what
> > version though??) if it it solves those problems. So I'd be interested
> > in seeing your gnu.crypto autoconf/automake files.
>
> You'll need recent versions, I have:
>
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.52e
> automake (GNU automake) 1.5a
Cygwin includes both those new versions and the older (more generally
available) versions ... I tend to agree that since only people maintaining
the classpathx packages should need to use autoconf/automake, it'd be
reasonable to require those versions. BUT: make sure they fail cleanly
when anyone tries to use the old versions!!
> I'll checkout the latest gnu-crypto and tune it against this version.
> Sorry I am runing out of time this week. I'll post something over the
> weekend.
Looking forward to something that "gnujaxp" can use... :)
> gcj -o pkg1.o -c pkg1/*.java
So you're mostly thinking about the "compile packages faster" question.
A similar solution could work for the "compile to shared object" case.
> Automake generates a Makefile that compiles java files one at a time.
Likely worth avoiding, though as you note GCJ is faster than "javac" so
such penalties shouldn't be significant -- when using GCJ.
> For us writing the software, I would really recommend ANT. ANT is
> the best tool to recompile small portion of a project at an increadible
> speed.
Actually Nic's Makefile templates achieve the same goal. Perhaps not
as elegantly as might be desired, but "javac ... @filelist" just gets the
files that have been recently modified.
- Dave
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues, (continued)
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), Olivier LF, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), Raif S. Naffah, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), David Brownell, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???), Olivier LF, 2001/12/06
- [Classpathx-discuss] autoconf/automake, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/06
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] autoconf/automake, Olivier LF, 2001/12/06
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] autoconf/automake, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/06
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT and JUNIT issues (automake???),
David Brownell <=
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus, David Brownell, 2001/12/02
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus, dog, 2001/12/03
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] ANT build in infobus, Raif S. Naffah, 2001/12/03