consensus
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of ful


From: Michael Rogers
Subject: Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of full traffic and server analysis
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:34:00 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 25/07/13 16:09, carlo von lynX wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:00:43AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> This is interesting, but not what I have in mind, which is a way
>> for two users to communicate asynchronously by storing and
>> collecting encrypted data at a third party.
> 
> think again, yours seems to me a special case of the above.... it's
> enough for you to have two devices ready to receive the message for
> the multicast thingie to pay off.

Yes, technically you could implement a dropbox using a multicast tree
with a single non-leaf node, a single leaf node and a very long
retention time. You could also implement a backscratcher using a
Sherman tank, but most people just use a stick. ;-)

Cheers,
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR8UVoAAoJEBEET9GfxSfMxRkH/ikezSpN7rTEUUHIisJUiBtX
Fg4+JUiCPrOau++qpSMRO0RWsrcaXLlr37v95WZzzZAl9kzRnfro+gxyCSaEK1Kt
j+hXk1F5LuTlYh3JJQk4+Ixb9UoWWtZaI4fe5hvlmVpi6ZgNGXTIdAd0TlwgHRQa
TsyeM289jVkACUD8AEXV/7twLgPRaJ6aVAMyjZJBCb4bhy/c+Gu++/0TWuEpyhHR
k5BpUs/VdvzJfQCsxnevPmMZTopeuX7VjLewd5fR2tNtuY1zH3R3cBB8KR49nMhu
neZhbsnnIlJvP46dTlrFEG9KGBO9m9OhFYdMaOBQ4y2fpG1eIsYNava3YQ1NhAA=
=j7fN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]