[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of ful
From: |
Michael Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of full traffic and server analysis |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:34:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/07/13 16:09, carlo von lynX wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:00:43AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> This is interesting, but not what I have in mind, which is a way
>> for two users to communicate asynchronously by storing and
>> collecting encrypted data at a third party.
>
> think again, yours seems to me a special case of the above.... it's
> enough for you to have two devices ready to receive the message for
> the multicast thingie to pay off.
Yes, technically you could implement a dropbox using a multicast tree
with a single non-leaf node, a single leaf node and a very long
retention time. You could also implement a backscratcher using a
Sherman tank, but most people just use a stick. ;-)
Cheers,
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR8UVoAAoJEBEET9GfxSfMxRkH/ikezSpN7rTEUUHIisJUiBtX
Fg4+JUiCPrOau++qpSMRO0RWsrcaXLlr37v95WZzzZAl9kzRnfro+gxyCSaEK1Kt
j+hXk1F5LuTlYh3JJQk4+Ixb9UoWWtZaI4fe5hvlmVpi6ZgNGXTIdAd0TlwgHRQa
TsyeM289jVkACUD8AEXV/7twLgPRaJ6aVAMyjZJBCb4bhy/c+Gu++/0TWuEpyhHR
k5BpUs/VdvzJfQCsxnevPmMZTopeuX7VjLewd5fR2tNtuY1zH3R3cBB8KR49nMhu
neZhbsnnIlJvP46dTlrFEG9KGBO9m9OhFYdMaOBQ4y2fpG1eIsYNava3YQ1NhAA=
=j7fN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Zooko's Triangle, (continued)
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Zooko's Triangle, Nick Jennings, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, elijah, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, Michael Rogers, 2013/07/25
- [GNU/consensus] having a "dropbox" in the age of full traffic and server analysis, carlo von lynX, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of full traffic and server analysis, Michael Rogers, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of full traffic and server analysis, carlo von lynX, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] having a "dropbox" in the age of full traffic and server analysis,
Michael Rogers <=
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, carlo von lynX, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, elijah, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, carlo von lynX, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, elijah, 2013/07/25
- Re: [GNU/consensus] Fwd: FYI: Securing the Future of the Social Web with Open Standards, Vincenzo Tozzi, 2013/07/25