consensus
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Zooko's Triangle


From: Klaus Wuestefeld
Subject: Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Zooko's Triangle
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:19:23 -0300

People wont authenticate multiple facets, will they?

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Melvin Carvalho
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25 July 2013 19:11, Klaus Wuestefeld <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I'm 100% with Marco. Forget friendly identifiers. Tor is already
>> playing with fire making its keys that short.
>>
>> Things will only get worse. With the advent of quantum computing we
>> are looking at public keys in the order of megabytes.
>>
>> We will all learn to keep address books like our grandmothers did for
>> unfriendly six digit phone numbers and street addresses.
>>
>> No big deal.
>
>
> Yes, this is true, but zooko's triangle only applies to a single string
> identity.
>
> In practice, identity is an OBJECT with facets.  So you can have an email, a
> telephone, a real name, a public key, or whatever you want.  In most cases
> there's no need to disambiguate, or even to remember anything.  This is
> exactly how facebook does it, and it works perfectly.  It's only when you
> pick ONE facet, and disallow all others that zooko's triangle comes into
> play.
>
> tl;dr this is only a problem for identifier overloading -- make identity a
> multi faceted object and have the best of all worlds
>
>>
>>
>> Klaus
>> http://sneer.me
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Michael Rogers
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On 25/07/13 11:10, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>> >> I think maybe what you are getting at is that you think using
>> >> address@hidden as the single identifier for a lot of different things
>> >> (email, chat, files, voip, social, etc) is a really bad idea. You
>> >> don't have to like it, but address@hidden is still the most commonly
>> >> used identifier there is. To embrace it is hardly being intolerant,
>> >> it is just being practical and backward compatible.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Embracing email as part of a holistic identity strategy could be
>> >> practical.  But if it's using email as the 'one identity to rule
>> >> them all' -- it's going to be fractured by nature.
>> >
>> > I don't think the suggestion is to use email addresses as universal
>> > identifiers, but simply to use the address@hidden format, which is
>> > memorisable, easily recognised, and clearly represents the
>> > user/service provider relationship.
>> >
>> > However, using one format for multiple services is confusing - already
>> > I can't put my Jabber ID on my business card without explaining that
>> > it's not an email address. Perhaps it would be appropriate to use
>> > different separators for different services - user#domain,
>> > user*domain, etc?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Michael
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>> >
>> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR8P2XAAoJEBEET9GfxSfMTBcIAKcxwJmhxQD3GqdggYZcL0QT
>> > KXlSJRuOZ/Y8L+97MRKTvSzOroNS5Gk6tIdv62V5OdPZGRejfqbYtFH6N94u7ApS
>> > ycIUCqxG83mLiDvb2I/5p7lANu60nV388OGfWlacqM2a5kYv5oB4N7f69Ci1LwCs
>> > rU5MiQ8Z1QQBYPvv3WAJnNoZjQdjG77f1GXYyRLYa37tvQaaK6DCUhrnSr8sTY5B
>> > N76fZDfOQJwu4Bdj/2r7H0tE+2IzkowEUYdCT//V75fCpyXRRd4SB6HYMk4jRJ1a
>> > y34UUiOKbCrshlw/N6McV31KzgkirLQONDpKM+ORdKlFKE+titArHwlUfOUnvso=
>> > =J38N
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SocialSwarm-DISCUSSION mailing list
>> > address@hidden
>> > https://mail.foebud.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/socialswarm-discussion
>> >
>> > Website        : http://socialswarm.net/
>> > Wiki           : https://wiki.socialswarm.net
>> > Liquid Feedback: https://socialswarm.tracciabi.li
>> >
>> > All mailing lists for SocialSwarm:
>> >
>> > SocialSwarm-ANNOUNCE (Announcements only; no discussion)
>> > SocialSwarm-DISCUSSION (discussion list)
>> > SocialSwarm-TECH (discussion list for technik and coders)
>> >
>> > https://mail.foebud.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/socialswarm-announce
>> > https://mail.foebud.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/socialswarm-tech
>> > https://mail.foebud.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/socialswarm-discussion
>> >
>> >
>> > FoeBuD e.V. | Marktstrasse 18 | 33602 Bielefeld | Germany |
>> > address@hidden
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Valeu, Klaus.
>
>



-- 
Valeu, Klaus.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]