[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dejagnu version update?
From: |
Andrew Pinski |
Subject: |
Re: dejagnu version update? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 May 2020 21:09:48 -0700 |
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:02 PM Rob Savoye <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 5/16/20 5:45 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > Overall perhaps a patch management system might be good having to make
> > chasing patches easier, such as patchwork, and we already use Git, so we
>
> As an old GNU project, we're required to use what the FSF prefers,
> which is on savannah. https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?group=dejagnu, Our
> bug tracker is there their too. We've used that for a long time. Yes,
> patches in email are harder to track.
>
> > fresh patchwork? The patch traffic is surely much lower with DejaGnu than
> > it is with glibc, and there would be no data to migrate (but we might want
> > to feed a couple of months' back worth of mailing list traffic).
>
> I'm now building up the infrastructure to properly test patches, but
> it's not enough to do the next release. All I have these days is my
> laptop and a PI B3+. I'd need access to more hardware as some of the
> patches effect cross testing, or get others to test the release candidates.
You should be able to use the gcc compilefarm too for this purpose
(https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm).
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Much of the problems with cross testing are often obscure timing
> problems. It's amazing how sometimes a minor unrelated change changes
> the timing and things break... To do a release properly requires
> duplicating that level of infrastructure for at least several targets
> and several toolchain release, and built on more than one GNU/Linux distro.
>
> It'll take most of the week to really get a good base setup with
> baseline test results, but some of the patches like the DejaGnu
> testsuite ones will go in first since they don't effect the toolchain.
>
> Jacob already added 9 patches to our site. I'm still building cross
> compilers since some of his patches effect cross testing. I did add ADA
> to my builds, which isn't a normal build default, since I thought some
> of the patches for ADA.
>
> - rob -
> ---
> https://www.senecass.com
- Re: dejagnu version update?, (continued)
- Re: dejagnu version update?, David Edelsohn, 2020/05/14
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/14
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Tom Tromey, 2020/05/14
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Mike Stump, 2020/05/15
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/15
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/05/14
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Maciej W. Rozycki, 2020/05/14
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/14
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Maciej W. Rozycki, 2020/05/16
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/16
- Re: dejagnu version update?,
Andrew Pinski <=
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Maciej W. Rozycki, 2020/05/17
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/17
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/05/17
- I volunteer (was: Re: dejagnu version update?), Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/05/18
- Re: I volunteer (was: Re: dejagnu version update?), Rob Savoye, 2020/05/18
- Re: I volunteer, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2020/05/18
- Re: I volunteer, Christophe Lyon, 2020/05/19
- Re: I volunteer, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/19
- Re: I volunteer, Rob Savoye, 2020/05/19
- Re: dejagnu version update?, Maciej W. Rozycki, 2020/05/14