[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?)
From: |
Chris Hanson |
Subject: |
Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:18:42 -0500 |
At 2:27 AM -0400 9/24/02, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
This time, you are absolutely wrong. Most OS X developers know about
GNUstep. Why aren't they here? The simple fact is, not many of them CARE.
Not entirely.
Many, many people have been watching GNUstep for years. They just
judge it not ready for prime time yet. And many Mac OS X developers
are interested in building great applications, not working on the
core frameworks.
Three things that would get Mac OS X developers using GNUstep:
* 100% of the basic AppKit working. I don't know where GNUstep
stands on this right now. It doesn't have to have all the bells and
whistles that the Cocoa AppKit does, but it also has to not have huge
gaps in major functionality.
* The ability to easily port from Cocoa to GNUstep. A simple nib
converter that's completely independent of GNUstep would go a long
way here.
* Windows support that they can deploy commercial applications with
(i.e. no cygwin).
Right now, it looks like it'll take a bunch of effort to port the
average Cocoa application to GNUstep, which many developers would
rather devote to making their Cocoa applications better. (Isn't the
interface in GNUMail.app hard-coded? That's something most Cocoa
programmers won't be interested in doing. At all.) The tipping
point, I think, will be Windows compatibility: If their investment of
effort means they can also ship their applications for Windows, they
may put it in.
-- Chris
-- Mac OS X developer, long-time GNUstep observer
PS - I have a couple of Open Source frameworks for Cocoa that GNUstep
developers may also find useful. Check out BDControl and
BDRuleEngine on the bDistributed.com web site. If there's interest,
I'll put tarballs of the latest sources on the site. (The code is
under a BSD-style license.)
--
Chris Hanson | Email: cmh@bDistributed.com
bDistributed.com, Inc. | Phone: +1-847-372-3955
Making Business Distributed | Fax: +1-847-589-3738
http://bdistributed.com/ | Personal Email: cmh@mac.com
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Jason Clouse, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Larry Coleman, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Tim Harrison, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Jeff Teunissen, 2002/09/24
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?),
Chris Hanson <=
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Ludovic Marcotte, 2002/09/28
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/09/28
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Dennis Leeuw, 2002/09/29
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Helge Hess, 2002/09/29
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/09/30
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/09/28
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/09/28
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/09/28
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Chris Hanson, 2002/09/28
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Chris Hanson, 2002/09/28