discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: project goal Re: Release schedule


From: Björn Gohla
Subject: Re: project goal Re: Release schedule
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:57:01 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2003-04-16 03:38, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> Jason Clouse wrote:
> > On 2003-04-15 06:26:07 +0000 Willem Rein Oudshoorn <woudshoo@xs4all.nl>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I agree with most points raised by Helge.  From my limited point
> > > of view superiority has nothing to do with becoming popular.
> > > Filling a need seems to be the crucial factor.
> >
> > That's exactly my point.  There is NO way GNUstep can fill a need on X11
> > because, with a few minor exceptions, all the major applications that
> > people need are already available there.  That's why Fresco (and the
> > easy portability between OS X and GNUstep) is a major opportunity.  With
> > Fresco, there IS a serious need for a desktop system and applications.
>
> Assumes facts not in evidence...primarily, that there is a need for Fresco
> in the first place, though that is by no means the only one. GGI is
> garbage, GII is worse, KGI is never going to become part of the kernel
> because Linus hates it, and even distributions that ship GNUstep stuff
> don't really do anything about Berlin/Fresco/whatever.

afaik fresco is not exclusively bound to any of those graphics libs, and of 
course distributions would not ship software that is not usable yet.

> Further, GNUstep wouldn't fit in at *all* with their system. They put the
> "widgets" into the display server, while GNUstep draws and handles its own
> UI elements.

so what, they have an interface alot more sophisticated.

> > I don't, however, recall anyone saying, "Why would I try Fresco?  X is
> > good enough."
>
> X is more than good enough, and from my perspective it's better on a
> technical level than Fresco is...but then, most other things are as well.
> But hey, that last part is merely an opinion.

well, x has been around for alot longer and been worked on and debugged. you 
will have to concede that the x interface is rather plain, and if you 
consider there being hundreds of widget sets, all mostly incompatible, the 
ultimate wisdom, then i can see that x is best for you ;).

- -- 
Article 24 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
   Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable
   limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger) <b.gohla@gmx.de>; key id: 834F4976; 
key fingerprint: 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5  8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976;
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+nLhubBQ8OYNPSXYRApQEAJ0TWVbU0yXTssx5PdezBRPb3tA0OwCff4mk
HbTkZGL0RFhOuPdEwSnLrns=
=1RM5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]