Re: [GSWHackers] Re: OGo/GNUstep cooperation Re: Re[2]: Frameworks integration

[Fred Kiefer]

Helge Hess wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
>
> > > | Manuel, I'm sorry to see that you have no intentions to do work on a
> > > | solution.
> >
> >
> > Probably a misunderstood. Remember, since before the begining of 
> > gsweb, I was open to cooperation to avoid doing same things twice. 
> > But, honestly, begining cooperation message with "Yet with OGo we now 
> > do have a high quality and proven WebObjects clone  and gnustep-web is 
> > somewhat obsolete for practical purposes" is very strange. Cultural 
> > difference ? :-(
>
>
> No, I don't think so. But I'm not really willing to discuss that anymore 
> with you, since you are obviously not very keen on working out a 
> solution if that may involve dropping own code even if this is based on 
> objective reasons.
>
> Really, I want to talk about that with the other gnustep-web developers 
> and users and of course with GNUstep in general (so far no one came up - 
> so is gnustep-web just you and David?).
> The discussion with you is stuck and I don't think we get it running 
> again. Feel free to make *productive* suggestions, and I consider.

I think you are wrong here, Helge. The last mail from Manuel sounded 
very productive to me. Now it is up to you to stop ranting, he did so 
with that mail.
A common development of a WebObjects clone would be beneficial to all 
sides, but the questions that Manuel raised on the organisational form 
are all valid and must be solved, no matter who takes part in that 
project. So I would call them productive suggestions. I would expect, 
that if you accept them as this, a solution to them wont be too far away.

Fred