discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocotron


From: Sašo Kiselkov
Subject: Re: Cocotron
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:26:39 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061117)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Helge Hess wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2006, at 13:18, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
>> Interresting that I was able to build a self-contained installable
>> binary application package of an app which uses additional libraries and
>> massively depends on run-time loading of bundles just using vanilla
>> GNUstep and all that in one day.
> 
> I'm not sure why this is interesting in the context :-)
> 
> Its a good demo on what is possible with GNUstep, but doesn't bring us
> any further in our setup.
> 
> Greets,
>   Helge
> --Helge Hess
> http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
> 

I was merely countering your claims that GNUstep is unusable for any
kind of ready-packaged working commercial product. It usable, and even
quite well. I build all my Windows tools using gnustep-base and I've had
little hassle in getting it work - merely involved copying the dependant
DLLs into the tool's directory.

- --
Saso
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFjpwvakxhuWWzY78RAx8+AJ9EdEPDzO8pp7J/eGRasZbQjiSm6QCfcONg
MHcYKcjsj67DGxTyw1DXE8w=
=U25W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]